Investment readiness & financing preparation  

Know where your investment case stands.
‍Prepare it for scrutiny.   

We assess readiness and prepare investment cases for mining projects, operating assets and acquisitions. We reconcile evidence, identify material gaps and risks, and address funding needs and financing requirements where relevant.
Before the next decision

What could block investment?

A project or acquisition can show attractive returns while assumptions conflict, approvals remain unresolved or funding needs are understated. We identify the evidence gaps and risks that could change the decision, and the actions or conditions needed before committing capital.
Incomplete or conflicting evidence
Unresolved risks and dependencies
Unmet approval or funding criteria
ENGAGEMENT OPTIONS

Assess readiness. Prepare the case.

Project Investment Readiness Assessment

Before your next mining investment or financing decision.
We assess whether your project’s evidence, capabilities and plans support the next investment, appraisal or financing decision. We identify material gaps, assess risks and dependencies, and define the actions and conditions needed to advance.
What you receive:
  • Readiness conclusions and conditions
  • Evidence gaps and risk registers
  • Priority actions and dependencies
  • Decision memo and evidence matrix
Discuss this service

Investment Case Preparation
‍

Prepare your case for board, investor or lender scrutiny.
We reconcile evidence into a defensible investment case for projects, operating assets and acquisitions. We test economics and alternatives, explain material risks and decision conditions, and address funding needs and financing requirements where commissioned.
What you receive:
  • Investment case or committee memo
  • Indexed evidence and issues register
  • Agreed model or scenario revisions
  • Decision conditions and Q&A preparation
Discuss this service
Scope, deliverables and fees are agreed before work begins. Integrated Project and Investment Risk Assessment is also available as a focused engagement or within the services above, connecting risks to value, cost, schedule and funding consequences.
Project Investment Readiness Assessment
01
We assess evidence across six dimensions to determine whether it supports your investment, appraisal or financing decision. We identify material gaps, conflicting assumptions and risks, then define the conditions and actions needed.
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Quantified readiness scorecard across six dimensions
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Evidence gaps and assumptions assessed
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Material risks and dependencies examined
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Readiness conditions and actions defined
Icon of three connected user profiles with a target circle around the central user.
Who it’s for
Developers, owners and acquirers, investors and lenders, governments and development institutions assessing mining projects or operating assets before an investment, appraisal or financing decision.
Curved path with two checkpoints leading to a flag marking a final destination or goal.
Outcome
A readiness conclusion supported by an evidence matrix, material gap and risk registers, and a prioritised action plan with owners, dependencies and conditions for the agreed decision.
Discuss your assessment
Man in office chair looking at computer screen showing a mine development plan with graphs and data.
Investment Case Preparation  
02
We reconcile evidence across six dimensions into a defensible investment case, testing economics, alternatives and material risks. We prepare the case and supporting evidence for scrutiny, with funding needs and confirmed financing requirements addressed where commissioned.
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Evidence and assumptions reconciled
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Economics and investment options tested
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Material risks and conditions explained
Teal check mark icon on a transparent background.
Investment case and evidence prepared
Icon of three connected user profiles with a target symbol surrounding the central profile.
Who it’s for
Developers, owners, acquirers and investment teams preparing a mining project, operating asset or acquisition case for board, investment committee, appraisal or financing review.
Curved path with checkpoints leading to a flag marking the destination or goal.
Outcome
An investment case or committee memo with indexed evidence, agreed analytical revisions, material risks and open issues, decision conditions and preparation for decision maker questions.
Discuss your investment case
Four professionals sit at a conference table viewing investment and risk data on a large screen.
STANDARDS & GOOD PRACTICE

Grounded in industry standards.

We assess readiness and prepare investment cases using relevant industry standards, good practice and project evidence. Across six dimensions, we examine whether assumptions, risks and plans support the intended investment or financing decision, with references selected for the asset, stage and jurisdiction.
Five icons in circles: stadium, bar chart with arrow, leaf, group of people, and compass.
Explore the six dimensions below to see what we examine and the references that inform our work. Applicable requirements and benchmarks vary with the asset, its maturity, jurisdiction and intended decision. Confirmed investor or lender requirements are incorporated where relevant to the agreed scope.
Technical & Infrastructure

We examine resource and reserve confidence, mine planning, processing and product quality, and the infrastructure needed to support the case, including power, water and logistics.

References and evidence:
  • Applicable mineral reporting requirements: NI 43-101 and CIM standards, JORC, or SEC S-K 1300, according to the reporting context.
  • CRIRSCO International Reporting Template: Common definitions and principles for mineral resource and reserve reporting.
  • Technical studies and supporting evidence: Geological models, mine plans, metallurgical testwork and infrastructure assessments.
Economics & Finance

We examine project economics and valuation, the funding plan and capital structure, and cash flow resilience. We test whether financial assumptions align with the underlying evidence and intended decision.

References and evidence:
  • FAST Standard principles: Guidance for structured, transparent and understandable financial models.
  • Financial assumptions and supporting data: Cost estimates, tax assumptions, funding terms and cash flow forecasts.
  • Confirmed investor or lender requirements: Relevant appraisal criteria, financing conditions and information requirements where commissioned.
Market & Commercial

We examine product demand and pricing, offtake and counterparty exposure, and the supply, infrastructure and other commercial agreements needed to support revenue and delivery assumptions.

References and evidence:
  • Market data and outlooks: Relevant commodity prices, demand analysis and product-specific market evidence.
  • Product specifications and offtake terms: Qualification requirements, pricing mechanisms, volumes and counterparty commitments.
  • Material commercial agreements: Supply, transport, power and other contracts that affect costs, access and delivery.
Environmental & Social

We examine tailings and mine waste; water, biodiversity, climate and environmental impacts; closure obligations; and workforce, community, human rights and Indigenous interests that could affect the investment decision.

References and evidence:
  • IFC Performance Standards: Environmental and social risk management, stakeholder engagement and relevant safeguards.
  • World Bank Group EHS Guidelines for Mining: Environmental, occupational and community health and safety good practice.
  • Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management: Tailings risk management across the facility lifecycle.
  • Equator Principles: Environmental and social requirements where applicable to the financing process.
Regulatory & Governance

We examine tenure, permits and approvals; fiscal, country and political exposure; and ownership, governance and compliance arrangements. We identify unresolved requirements and dependencies that could affect investment or financing.

References and evidence:
  • Applicable laws and approval requirements: Mining rights, permits, fiscal obligations and conditions relevant to the asset.
  • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance: Board oversight, shareholder rights, disclosure and accountability.
  • OECD Guidelines for Responsible Business Conduct: Guidance on business conduct, due diligence and management of adverse impacts.
Delivery & Operations

We examine project scope and study maturity, execution plans and cost and schedule confidence, and the owner capability, contracting approach and operating systems needed to deliver the case.

References and evidence:
  • AACE Recommended Practice 47R-11: Mining cost-estimate classification and the maturity of supporting project definition.
  • Execution and operating evidence: Schedules, contracting plans, organisational capability and operating readiness.
  • Relevant delivery benchmarks: Comparable costs, schedules and operating performance, with their relevance and limitations explained.
FAQ

Investment readiness FAQs

What the work covers, how the engagements differ, and what to expect when preparing a mining project, operating asset or acquisition for investment or financing review.
What does the readiness assessment evaluate?

The Project Investment Readiness Assessment examines whether available evidence supports your next investment, appraisal or financing decision. It screens six dimensions: Technical & Infrastructure, Economics & Finance, Market & Commercial, Environmental & Social, Regulatory & Governance, and Delivery & Operations. We focus on material gaps, conflicting assumptions, risks and dependencies, then provide a readiness conclusion and the actions or conditions needed to advance.

How does this differ from a technical report or due diligence review?

Technical reports and specialist due diligence provide essential evidence within their respective scopes. Our work examines how that evidence connects across the investment case, whether assumptions are consistent, and how material risks affect the intended decision. It can precede formal due diligence or help address issues identified during review. Qualified specialists remain responsible for their technical, legal, tax and other professional opinions.

How does Investment Case Preparation differ?

The assessment asks whether the evidence supports your next decision and what needs attention. Investment Case Preparation brings the evidence together into a defensible case, tests economics and alternatives, and explains material risks and decision conditions. Outputs include an investment case or committee memo, indexed evidence, agreed analytical revisions and preparation for decision maker questions. Either engagement can be commissioned directly, without completing the other first.

Who can commission the work, and which assets does it cover?

Developers, owners, acquirers, investors and lenders can commission the work, as can governments and development institutions with a defined appraisal or investment decision. The service covers mining projects, operating assets and acquisitions. Scope is tailored to the asset’s maturity, available evidence and intended decision. We agree who commissions the work, who may use the report, and the required level of assessment before starting.

How are scope, timing and fees agreed?

We start with the decision you need to make, your deadline and the evidence available. We then agree the scope, deliverables, required inputs, specialist involvement, schedule and fees before work begins. A lighter diagnostic can focus on priority issues where a full assessment is unnecessary. Timing depends on evidence quality, access to relevant people and the depth of analysis required.

Can the work support investor or lender review?

Yes. Where commissioned, we address funding needs, financing alternatives and confirmed investor or lender requirements, and prepare the case and supporting evidence for scrutiny. Financing decisions remain with capital providers, while the client and its appointed advisers lead investor communication and transaction execution. A sponsor-commissioned report is not automatically an independent lender report. Conflicts, independence requirements and permitted report use are agreed for each engagement.

Get Started

Bring clarity to your next investment decision.

Tell us what you need to decide, what information you have and when you need an answer. We’ll discuss how Minesmart can help and propose a focused scope with clear deliverables.
Discuss a decision
Need help?