Mine closure & transition for mining and critical minerals projects
(IGF, 2024)
(Cross-jurisdictional legal review)
(ERM, 2025)
(Moody's Ratings)
Start with the diagnostic. Scale from there.



Closure Strategy, Planning & Compliance

Questions clients ask before engaging
We handle closure strategy, cost modelling, financial assurance, and compliance directly. Detailed technical design, geochemistry, water treatment, and landform engineering are delivered through specialist partners we coordinate, not in-house. Our role is making sure all of it adds up to one defensible closure position.
Most clients start with a single engagement, either the readiness assessment or the cost and liability review, tied to a specific need: an upcoming audit, a transaction, or a board request. From there, many move to a standing retainer aligned to their jurisdiction's regulatory refresh cycle, so the position stays current rather than going stale between reviews. Neither path requires the other; you decide after the first engagement.
Yes. The readiness assessment stands on its own and is where most clients start. If it surfaces gaps in your cost estimate or provisioning, we can scope an independent cost and liability review as a separate, second engagement. There is no bundled programme you are committing to upfront.
Existing estimates, especially those built early or by the same team managing the mine plan, often understate real costs, since there's a natural incentive to keep numbers that support the project's economics. We independently validate or rebuild the model so it holds up to outside scrutiny
We're not the engineering firm designing the works, or the team whose plan needs the number to look good. Our assessment holds up whether it's a regulator, an auditor, or your own board checking it, not built to flatter one outcome.
Yes. This is exactly what our closure liability due diligence service is built for. We can turn around an independent liability assessment on a transaction timeline, so the deal price or the loan terms reflect the real closure exposure rather than the seller's or borrower's own number.
If you're an operator managing an active closure obligation, an investor or lender assessing one, or a board or audit committee that needs an independent view of a closure number, yes. If you need engineering design, construction oversight, or on-site execution, we're not the right fit for that piece of the work, and we'll tell you so directly and point you to the right partner.